Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do,
forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things
which are ahead, I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of
God in Christ Jesus (Phil. 3:13,
14,
NKJV).
(Overview and commentary on: Paul: Mission and Message- Lesson 12)
Karakia Timatanga | Opening Prayer
He hōnore, he korōria ki te atua
All honour and glory to our maker
He maungārongo ki te whenua
Let there be peace and tranquillity on earth
He whakaaro pai ki ngā tangata katoa
Goodwill to mankind
Āmine.
Amen
Saturday | Sabbath | Hātarei
Sunday | Rātapu
Greeks and JewsPaul talked about things that got in the road of Greeks and Jews believing. Yes signs and wisdom got in the road for many but not for all. Are there stumbling blocks within our own culture? Yes possibly. I think there are more stumbling blocks for Adventists than there are for Christians in general. Can we see them or are they unrecognisable? I will suggest a few. Feel free to agree or disagree.
Entertainment +/ Consumerism
Alcohol +/ Food +/ 'Recreational' drug use
Wealth +/ Property
Science + Technology
Sports + Leisure
Work +/ Status
Time
Fear
Alcohol +/ Food +/ 'Recreational' drug use
Wealth +/ Property
Science + Technology
Sports + Leisure
Work +/ Status
Time
Fear
and perhaps the biggest stumbling block of all - US - YOU and ME (blundering, inconsistent, arrogant, opinionated, unwise Christians).
Monday | Rāhina
Soldiers and Athletes
Ancient Olympics |
I suspect that Paul's illustrations about running and soldiering would have gone down well with his Gentile audience. It may not have gone down so well with a Jewish audience who would have found athletics not in keeping with their faith and traditions.
Tuesday | Rātū
Paul and the Law
As an Adventist I accept Schantz and Thompson's (2015) interpretation of the law but I am prepared to examine other explanations that have evidence from within the Bible. As Christians we should always be willing to test our ideas and see if they are robust enough to withstand scrutiny. If the idea is not robust enough to withstand a thorough examination it is not worth holding on to. God has endowed us with the ability to think and He expects us to actively to pursue truth (Jn 14:6) which can at times place us in some discomfort if we have to let some idea go that we have held for a long time. Changes in our thinking may change the way we behave and that can also put us in a place of tension.
The Mitzvot
An understanding of the law and some of the verses associated with it have not necessarily been understood well by Adventists and as a denomination we are well versed in law. When Jews talk about the law they are often speaking of the 613 laws and do not necessarily separate them from the ten commandments. We on the other hand have taken the ten and not necessarily considered the other 613. It is unfortunate that we cannot interrogate Paul further - unfortunately he's not here and we have to do the best we can.
Schantz and Thompson (2015) say "the ceremonial laws, detailing how one approached God through priesthood, Hebrew sanctuary, and sacrifices, ceased to be valid after the crucifixion." I accept this but, then we (Adventists) are left with a bit of a theological problem with regard to observing the restrictions around what food we eat. We argue well that these are health laws and that our bodies are the temple of God's spirit but the point remains that these are not part of the ten.
Paul may have viewed converts to Christianity quite differently in his expectations as to their observance of Jewish laws (Paul the Apostle and Judaism, n.d.). We know this was the case with circumcision (Gal 6:15; 1 Co 7:19; Col 2:11; Col 3:11). We also know that Paul circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:3) and practised Jewish ritual when called upon by the elders at Jerusalem (Acts 21:17-27). The explanation for this apparent inconsistency is that Paul expected Jews to observe all of the Mitzvot laws but not the Gentiles.
As an Adventist, ten is quite enough. I am also glad that God does not change (Mal 3:6; Num 23:19).
As an Adventist I accept Schantz and Thompson's (2015) interpretation of the law but I am prepared to examine other explanations that have evidence from within the Bible. As Christians we should always be willing to test our ideas and see if they are robust enough to withstand scrutiny. If the idea is not robust enough to withstand a thorough examination it is not worth holding on to. God has endowed us with the ability to think and He expects us to actively to pursue truth (Jn 14:6) which can at times place us in some discomfort if we have to let some idea go that we have held for a long time. Changes in our thinking may change the way we behave and that can also put us in a place of tension.
An understanding of the law and some of the verses associated with it have not necessarily been understood well by Adventists and as a denomination we are well versed in law. When Jews talk about the law they are often speaking of the 613 laws and do not necessarily separate them from the ten commandments. We on the other hand have taken the ten and not necessarily considered the other 613. It is unfortunate that we cannot interrogate Paul further - unfortunately he's not here and we have to do the best we can.
The Mitzvot |
An understanding of the law and some of the verses associated with it have not necessarily been understood well by Adventists and as a denomination we are well versed in law. When Jews talk about the law they are often speaking of the 613 laws and do not necessarily separate them from the ten commandments. We on the other hand have taken the ten and not necessarily considered the other 613. It is unfortunate that we cannot interrogate Paul further - unfortunately he's not here and we have to do the best we can.
Schantz and Thompson (2015) say "the ceremonial laws, detailing how one approached God through priesthood, Hebrew sanctuary, and sacrifices, ceased to be valid after the crucifixion." I accept this but, then we (Adventists) are left with a bit of a theological problem with regard to observing the restrictions around what food we eat. We argue well that these are health laws and that our bodies are the temple of God's spirit but the point remains that these are not part of the ten.
Paul may have viewed converts to Christianity quite differently in his expectations as to their observance of Jewish laws (Paul the Apostle and Judaism, n.d.). We know this was the case with circumcision (Gal 6:15; 1 Co 7:19; Col 2:11; Col 3:11). We also know that Paul circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:3) and practised Jewish ritual when called upon by the elders at Jerusalem (Acts 21:17-27). The explanation for this apparent inconsistency is that Paul expected Jews to observe all of the Mitzvot laws but not the Gentiles.
As an Adventist, ten is quite enough. I am also glad that God does not change (Mal 3:6; Num 23:19).
Wednesday | Rāapa
The Cross and the Resurrection
For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified (1 Cor. 2:2, NKJV)
Well, actually Paul believed in a lot more than this but this was his starting premise.
He also believed in the physical resurrection and outlines its importance to Christianity. (1 Co 15:12-13; Rom 6:4; Rom 8:11; 1 Co 6:14; 2 Tim 2:8; 1 Co 15:14-20) These texts are so important please read them. I am a Christian because I believe Jesus was raised from the dead.
For us so far removed in time in place from these events there is still sufficient reason to believe if you wish to examine the evidence you might wish to start with Lee Strobel's book 'The Case for Christ'.
Any understanding of Christianity that defines itself differently is not the gospel or the Christianity of the Bible. Leave it well alone or turn your mind to doing something else because the gospel without the resurrection is useless.
Wikipedia (Paul the Apostle, n.d.) sums up Paul's message well in six points:
Well, actually Paul believed in a lot more than this but this was his starting premise.
He also believed in the physical resurrection and outlines its importance to Christianity. (1 Co 15:12-13; Rom 6:4; Rom 8:11; 1 Co 6:14; 2 Tim 2:8; 1 Co 15:14-20) These texts are so important please read them. I am a Christian because I believe Jesus was raised from the dead.
For us so far removed in time in place from these events there is still sufficient reason to believe if you wish to examine the evidence you might wish to start with Lee Strobel's book 'The Case for Christ'.
Any understanding of Christianity that defines itself differently is not the gospel or the Christianity of the Bible. Leave it well alone or turn your mind to doing something else because the gospel without the resurrection is useless.
Wikipedia (Paul the Apostle, n.d.) sums up Paul's message well in six points:
1. God sent his Son.2. The Son was crucified for the sins of humanity.3. After being dead three days, the Son was raised from the dead, defeating death.4. The Son would soon return.5. Those in Christ will live with him forever.6. Followers are urged to live by a set apart (sanctified) standard—"And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.Schantz and Thompson (2015) round this message out with three brief and vital points:
1. Only God has immortality (1 Tim 6:16);
2. Immortality is a gift from God to the saved (1 Thess 4:16);
3. Death is a sleep until Christ returns (1 Thess 4:13-15; 1 Cor 15:6).
Thursday | Rāpare
Getting Along
John Mark (Orthodox icon) |
Considerations for practise
1. Did Jesus rise from the dead as Paul has said?
2. If your answer is Yes what are you going to do about it?
If your answer is No this also has implications.
2. If your answer is Yes what are you going to do about it?
If your answer is No this also has implications.
Closing Prayer - Karakia Whakamutunga
2 Corinthians 13:14 (NIV)
May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all.
Next week. Must the whole world hear? - Lesson 13.
References
Longenecker, D. (2012, December 18). Who wrote Mark? In Patheos. Retrieved from http://www.patheos.com/blogs/standingonmyhead/2012/12/who-wrote-mark.html
Paul the Apostle (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle
Paul the Apostle and Judaism (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle_and_Judaism
Schantz, B. & Thompson, S. (2015). Biblical Missionaries. Adult Sabbath School Quarterly 3Q. 2015. Silver Spring: MD: Pacific Press.
Strobel, L. (1998). The case for Christ. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
Paul the Apostle (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle
Paul the Apostle and Judaism (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle_and_Judaism
Schantz, B. & Thompson, S. (2015). Biblical Missionaries. Adult Sabbath School Quarterly 3Q. 2015. Silver Spring: MD: Pacific Press.
Strobel, L. (1998). The case for Christ. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We request that all comments addressed to either the main post or other comments be respectful. By all means disagree and challenge ideas but treat the person with dignity.